Scan barcode
billyjepma's reviews
623 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
And yet, I love it all to death. Brown's storytelling might be limited, but it reaches the highest peak of that self-imposed ceiling. If this is wish fulfillment, then it's a wish that is not unworthy of fulfillment. Darrow might be a masculine ideal, but he might be an ideal that's actually worth a damn. To Brown's credit, he often practices self-awareness with Darrow's characterization, too, never letting himself or the reader forget that Darrow is condemning himself by engaging in the same deceptions and brutality he's fighting against. That messy, murky morality is the lifeblood of these books—that, and the ever-so-impressive spectacle of its action and the kinetic pace of its plotting, of course. Whenever I felt like the story was growing too fond of itself, there would be a new twist of the knife or complication of an idea to mix things up and muddy the waters even further. I love how cynical it is and how dour its beliefs of humanity are, even as it dares to ponder the beautiful and terrible potential of a better future. It might fall into the dystopia genre, but it has more edges and a far less heroic slant than many of its peers, at least the ones I'm familiar with, and it's all the better for it.
At their core, these books—and this sequel especially—excel at occupying a unique and special place between the pulpy thrills of an 80s action movie and the hard, angry edges of modern political unrest. It's a delicate balance that doesn't always work perfectly, but it's scratching an itch I didn't know I had and definitely didn't know I wanted this bad. It's the perfect story for me to finally read, hot off another horrendous presidential race, full of exhaustion at the prospect of the next four years, and stuck with an aimless, shapeless sort of anger I don't know what to do with. As an outlet for all of those feelings, this series is a bloodydamn miracle.
“That’s what Society does—spread the blame so there is no villain, so it’s futile to even begin to find a villain, to find justice. It’s just machinery. Processes. And it rumbles on, inexorable till a whole generation rises that will throw themselves on the gears.”
Graphic: Death, Violence, Blood, War, and Classism
Moderate: Slavery, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Vomit
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Death, Violence, Blood, Murder, War, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Moderate: Animal death, Rape, Sexual assault, and Slavery
Minor: Excrement and Cannibalism
3.75
Graphic: Medical content and Medical trauma
Moderate: Mental illness
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
2.5
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Overall, this was a welcome way to get me back on the series’ wavelength and eager to get back to the characters I’m invested in, especially after being mixed on a lot of the choices made for Phase 2.
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
The characters are a mixed bag overall, but the core adventurers have enough variety in their quirks that I never disliked anyone (well, not more than intended, anyway). It's too bad the POV character is the weakest link, as his empty personality and iffy-at-best opinion of women tested my patience more than once. There are other areas of friction, though, as the book is a relic of the era and, as can be expected, is littered with unsubtle racism, sexism, and a general air of Western Exceptionalism that's so pervasive it feels almost parodic. I knew to expect all that going in and had my guard up and ready for those less-than-pleasant aspects, which helped me power through to get to the parts I liked. I can't say it's a book I can heartily recommend, but I enjoyed my time with it (although I wish my audiobook had a better narrator) and am glad I took the time to give it a go.
Graphic: Racism
Moderate: Gun violence, Racial slurs, Sexism, Slavery, Violence, and Colonisation
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
But hey, I'm not opposed to the series being a yearly treat I can look forward to because it really is a fun, pulpy, exciting book to pick up. Dell'Edera's art is only getting better, too. He's doing some of my favorite layouts in an ongoing series right now, and I love how cinematic he frames each scene. Everything from action to horror to dialogue has a visual tempo that makes the pages fly by. I feel similarly about Muerto's colors, which have received a major boost from the daytime setting of these last several volumes. The darker pages are good, but I love some sunlit horror, and this book has the goods in that category.
Graphic: Child death, Death, and Blood
Moderate: Body horror, Cancer, and Violence
Minor: Death of parent and Lesbophobia
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
It's as messy as any time travel story, and like most of them, it doesn't have the most satisfying ending to tie up all the timey-wimey threads that crisscross the millenniums. However, it is a vibrant, wonderfully realized coming-of-age adventure filled with just as much pulpy genre shenanigans as it is heartfelt interpersonal drama around self-actualization and all the anxieties associated with it. Big feelings, sensational colors, rich relationships—yeah, of course I loved it.
I still don't love Vaughan's writing quite as much as I want to, but this might be some of the better plotting I've seen from him. Every issue has a great hook, whether a new twist, bit of characterization, or amazing artwork (Chiang is so good, it's unreal), and the zippy pacing helps each escalation go down smoothly, no matter how ambitious it is. Even Vaughan's penchant for shock-and-awe pays off since the time travel aspects let him loop back around the timeline and give early twists more depth after the fact.
And most importantly, I really love the characters. You can raise an eyebrow at the entire creative team being men—and you'd be valid in doing so—but the characterizations feel rich and lived-in. Their various quirks and bouts of irreverence (which any reader of Vaughan's will recognize) come off as authentic to adolescents dealing with shit they don't understand, and I appreciate how Vaughan doesn't shy away from giving the story a sappy heart of gold underneath its exciting antics. Chiang's expressive art carries it all across the finish line, with colors and reactions that make every page a joy to read. He kills it with the spectacle, but it's his subtler character work that ultimately made me fall in love with the book's punk-rock nostalgia and neon-colored sentimentalities.
Graphic: Cancer
Moderate: Cursing, Homophobia, Violence, and Blood
Minor: Rape