Scan barcode
rachelfegan's review against another edition
4.0
This book explores how women’s bodies have been depicted and manipulated socially, culturally, in the media and in our minds throughout history, and how this consciously and unconsciously affects our thoughts, decision making, biases and relationships with our own and others’ bodies. It also explores diet culture, fatphobia, micro-trends, and the impact of social media. I liked that it was made up of insights from healthcare professionals, anecdotal stories from the author, and was backed by research and evidence based approaches. The book also offers practical strategies for how to shut out the noise from the media and work towards a body neutral mindset. My main take away from this book is that it has never been our bodies’ job to make us look good, but to keep us healthy, surviving, and functioning as best it can.
labyrinth_witch's review against another edition
challenging
informative
reflective
medium-paced
5.0
One of the best books I’ve read on disengaging from diet-culture and a critical look at the body positivity trend. Helpful steps and resources throughout.
jacbradley's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
fast-paced
2.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Eating disorder
nicoleheims's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
fast-paced
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Fatphobia and Eating disorder
ali_w15's review against another edition
5.0
Amazing! Where has this book been all my life? Feel like I’ve learned a lot I can take forward in my life.
sophielinehan39's review against another edition
challenging
informative
inspiring
lighthearted
reflective
medium-paced
3.0
there was more about diet culture and recovering from disordered eating than body image (the reason I wanted to read it). the last few chapters were really interesting. i think it would be soooo helpful for people who need help with disordered eating/exercising.
sidodevilleduval's review against another edition
fast-paced
2.0
The bits about history didn't really sit right with me because it just perpetuated myths, over-generalised, and didn't cite their sources. It was really reminiscent of a Tiktok historian. There are quite a few examples of this but one is on page 32 where Light says diet culture picked up traction "around the same time that women won the right to vote in many countries" and that it was created to subdue women because "it's hard to smash the patriarchy on an empty stomach" (Harrison). And then cites Christy Harrison and Naomi Wolf who came up with this theory. However, neither Harrison or Wolf are historians. Both are journalists, and Wolf is a known conspiracy theorist with proven examples of spreading misinformation. (The example of "death recorded" should be enough evidence that Naomi Wolf shouldn't be taken as an historical researcher). And there's no actual evidence cited to support this theory. It's all a very circumstantial string of occurances that ignores cultural events and context beyond that of feminism and diet culture.
It was much better when it came to the modern stuff. The author cited verified statistics and published studies and it paid off, it was really interesting. But all of it coming after the history stuff in the first chapter just created a cloud for the rest of the book because I was always aware that misinformation had already made it past the editors so wasn't sure how much I could trust from the rest.
One other criticism is that it says a lot of what's wrong but doesn't really offer enough solutions to balance it. I like it in theory but it just felt surface-level for what it was trying to achieve. It all just felt a bit rushed, like with more research and deeper exploration of the topics I think it would have been a lot better.
The message was great and some parts of the book made really good points. And I will say it had a positive effect as I've now unfollowed Instagram models. But I feel like overall it could have been executed so much better.
It was much better when it came to the modern stuff. The author cited verified statistics and published studies and it paid off, it was really interesting. But all of it coming after the history stuff in the first chapter just created a cloud for the rest of the book because I was always aware that misinformation had already made it past the editors so wasn't sure how much I could trust from the rest.
One other criticism is that it says a lot of what's wrong but doesn't really offer enough solutions to balance it. I like it in theory but it just felt surface-level for what it was trying to achieve. It all just felt a bit rushed, like with more research and deeper exploration of the topics I think it would have been a lot better.
The message was great and some parts of the book made really good points. And I will say it had a positive effect as I've now unfollowed Instagram models. But I feel like overall it could have been executed so much better.