Reviews with content warning for Sexual violence - A Clockwork Orange

Reviews tagging 'Sexual violence'

A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess

193 reviews

thet0meraider's review against another edition

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

31 anni dopo l'uscita di Arancia Meccanica, Anthony Burgess ha detto, in un articolo per The Observer in cui riflette sul ruolo della sua novella nella diffusione della violenza giovanile: "[In the book and movie adaptation] the question was asked: is it permissible to kill free will in order to ensure the stability of society? Not many viewers of the film took notice of the question: most were too excited by the violence to bother about the philosophy of the concept".

E aggunge: "My argument was that action was anterior to art; that aggression was built into the human system and could not be taught by a book, film or play. [...] If one wished to believe that a book could instigate violence, the Bible could be one’s first choice, and yet this was taken to be the Word of God. [...] From the film of A Clockwork Orange youth did not learn aggression: it was aggressive already. What it did learn was a style of aggression, a mode of dressing violence up in a new way, a piquant sauce to season the raw meat of kicks, biffs and razor-slashings".

"Arancia Meccanica" è un romanzo straordinario che affronta temi complessi e sempre attuali con una prosa coinvolgente e innovativa. La storia, ambientata in un futuro distopico (anni '70, con il libro pubblicato nel 1962), segue le vicende di Alex DeLarge, un giovane delinquente immerso in una società violenta e decadente. Uno dei punti di forza del romanzo è sicuramente lo stile linguistico unico, che mescola l'inglese con uno slang che richiama il russo inventato dall'autore, noto come "Nadsat" (letteralmente, "adolescente", nella lingua del romanzo), arricchendo così la narrazione con una profondità e una vivacità impareggiabili.

Il tema centrale del conflitto tra libero arbitrio individuale e controllo sociale è trattato in modo magistrale, portando il lettore a riflettere sulle implicazioni morali delle azioni di Alex e sul ruolo della società nel plasmare il comportamento umano. La narrazione è avvincente e incalzante, mantenendo costantemente l'attenzione del lettore e offrendo spunti di riflessione profondi e stimolanti.

Ho trovato straziante, dall'inizio alla fine, la volontà di Alex si essere cattivo, punto e basta. Il ragazzo, appena quindicenne, non fa del male per ribellarsi al mondo - lo fa perché gli piace, ne gode, lo fa sentire al settimo cielo. E questo, devo dirlo, mi ha profondamente scossa. Non solo: finché rimane un ragazzo, Alex non ha intenzione di redimersi. Anzi.

Ci sono stati dei momenti in cui il mio metro morale mi ha portato a sentirmi in pena per Alex: vedere un ragazzino che piange per sé stesso, estremamente infelice, non è mai piacevole. Eppure le sensazioni altalenanti che ho provato nei confronti del protagonista devono portarmi anche a ragionare su di me, sulle mie credenze. Mi sono scoperta a provare godimento nel sapere Alex sottoposto alla cura riabilitativa forzata. Ho gioito nel sapere che non sarebbe più stato in grado di fare del male, anche se sotto forzatura, e nel constatare che la punizione era doppiamente efficace, perché ha rimosso anche il piacere che il ragazzino provava nell'ascoltare musica classica - peraltro con una spocchia davvero insopportabile.
Ho però anche sofferto per lui in diverse occasioni: nel vederlo usato e strumentalizzato da diverse fazioni politiche; nel saperlo respinto dalla famiglia (anche se se lo merita! Questa dualità, argh!) e solo e, per una volta, forse ingiustamente picchiato dalla brutale polizia (o magari, ancora, se lo è meritato per tutte le brutte azioni fatte in passato! Aaaaargh). Persino delle tendenze suicide mi sono dispiaciuta, pur restando dell'opinione che se la sia cercata.

Il romanzo trova una degna conclusione, a parer mio. Se si fosse chiuso diversamente, su una nota ancora negativa dopo tutto quello che abbiamo visto nel corso del romanzo, forse non lo avrei apprezzato così tanto.
Forse la cura è davvero solo la maturazione, forse basta solo davvero diventare grandi.

Sono davvero molto contenta di aver affrontato questa lettura. Sono arrivata senza aspettative e me ne sono andata arricchita, stimolata, piena di riflessioni da compiere sul mondo e, soprattutto, su di me.

Consigliato!

Content Warnings

sugarcube's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

I read this after having watched the movie multiple times. The movie is one of my favorite movies for the questions it raises, and I was told to read the book because of

its different ending

(I had already tried but found it too similar to be worth finishing at first).

I ended up liking the book after all because I appreciate the additional insight into Alex's thoughts that are limited by the runtime of the movie. However,

I take issue with the ending. For Alex to simply grow out of it seems to imply that the events of the story were entirely inconsequential. Now, the movie is similar in that they both imply that Alex will always have ended up this way, regardless of his experiences. However, the movie suggests a much darker message underneath that. Burgess seems to suggest that violence is inherent to the mind of a growing boy, while Kubrick seems to suggest instead that some people are born a monsters and no meddling will fix that.
Frankly, I just disliked the ending of the book because I disagreed with it.
Other than that, I did like the book. I love the quirks of the nadsat language, especially in the way it feels like it distances and distracts from the brutality that actually occurs. It feels like you're really in Alex's head, and I liked that immersion.

Content Warnings

avery03's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced

4.0

I had to practically learn a new language to read this but once I did it was a very quick read. This is definitely a book I think everyone should read.

Content Warnings

valentereads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional reflective tense

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

For a dyspraxic reader, coming to terms with the 'Ndsatt' or teen talk in the book was very frustrating at first, and I thought that I would hate the origionality of Burgess' language until the end, even if I liked the story and the social commentary it provided on difficult issues. But the more I read the more I understood the talk and therefore the story, and I don't think a clockwork orange would be so unique, origional, or so vivid in its influence without this.

I get mixed mesages about the writer's commentary on the development of the teenager, and he uses excess of violence to show alex's youth journey. Perhaps i do not understand the social and historical context of the text enough, but i did not understand if Burgess was saying that teens and teddy boys are a negative thing, or that eveyone has free choice and needs to develop through phases.

I hate Alex, he is vile, and yet I also love him as a character!

Content Warnings

cjfooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

You know what, I actually enjoyed this. I got to say - I wasn’t expecting to.
It was one of those books I wanted to read to say I’d read it and to watch the movie, which I know is a cult classic (although tbh I don’t feel the need now). The only other thing I knew about it going in, was that it was very graphically violent - and wow it definitely is, but not in the way you’d expect.

Firstly, the first part is quite confusing because by this point, not only are you still trying to understand the book’s world and meet characters, but the language is actually its own unique dialect of English.

They mention it at some point, but it’s the young people slang of this fictional world and includes a lot of Russian-derived words in place of English ones. This means most commonly used nouns and verbs are totally incoherent at the start. But towards the middle and end I actually really enjoyed this part of it and now, after reading, sort of miss listening to it, in the way you might miss hearing an Irishmen speak after visiting Ireland for a week.

I’m also really glad I read it for the first time as an audiobook for this reason - I think I understood it quicker and better this way.

When it comes to all the violence though, it’s dampened considerably by the language factor in a very clever way, never using the words like ‘r*pe’, ‘screaming/crying’ or ‘bl**d’ instead ‘the ol’ in-out-in-out’, ‘screeching’ and ‘krovvy’. Between this and the matter-of-a-fact narration about atrocities from Alex (the main character) i think the point here is to try and make the reader read in Alex’s detached perspective, instead of their own.
The language does change throughout the book and, man the way it’s written is so a unique, that I can’t help but respect the heck out of it (which is also why I don’t think the movie could ever do it justice).

Once Alex goes through ‘rehab’, the language he hears and starts using, changes to the ‘ugly’ words we’re used to (I.e. r*pe, etc.) and, this, combined with Alex’s correlated nausea, makes the impact of the violence that much stronger.

In terms of plot, it’s heavily a character development, rather than plot. And seems to be making some sort of a point but I’ll admit - I still don’t really get it.
To me overall, it’s a cleverly written story about morality, cruelty, karma and a very clever use of language.

I wasn’t expecting to say I’d read this again but I think I would - and would recommend it in certain cases - but only for horror fans (though I wouldn’t actually call this horror) who can stomach a lot of violence in books.

Content Warnings