Scan barcode
karteikati's review against another edition
dark
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
bosermoki's review against another edition
challenging
dark
inspiring
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
celestriakle's review against another edition
challenging
funny
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
More social commentary than narrative, everyone in this book is silly, dramatic, and absurd. A funny bunch of fools wrapped up in social commentary about the role of religion vs science in modern society.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence, Death, Infidelity, Injury/Injury detail, and Murder
Moderate: Misogyny, War, Gun violence, Mental illness, and Classism
Minor: Antisemitism, Xenophobia, Ableism, Racism, Alcohol, Animal cruelty, Car accident, Forced institutionalization, and Sexual content
Period-typical dubcon whereserialreader's review against another edition
adventurous
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
tansybradshaw's review against another edition
3.0
I liked it. I think I need to read it at a later stage, as someone who isn't familiar with the bible story - I struggled a bit because of that.
overdramaticsoprano's review against another edition
challenging
dark
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder
Moderate: Sexual assault, Suicide, and Sexual content
blackoxford's review against another edition
4.0
Raining Angels in Paris and Washington
Can there be such a genre, biblical material excepted, as the anticipatory allegory? If so, Revolt of the Angels could well be a prime example.
In this week's NYRB (Nov. 6 2017), Charles Simic has a piece commemorating Trump's election. In it he puts Trump in a literary context:
I think Simic is exactly right to place Trump historically in the French Third Republic, and not just because of his Ubu-esque personality. In fin de siecle France Politics are polarised. Religious belief is a defining issue. Racism is on the rise. Freedom, defined to suit, is the rallying cry of both Right and Left. Terrorism is on everyone’s mind. Fake news is the only kind there is. The foundations of the democratic state seem less than they have been in decades. The Revolution has been betrayed and the Nation belittled.
Revolt of the Angels is a parody of this tumultuous period. But, frightenly I find, it is also a very precise allegory of today's USA - written a century before events. The characters and plot seem out of the Trumpian playbook
The Angels in question, mostly guardian and therefore the alter-egos of the individuals they protect, have decided to mount a Miltonian rerun of the abortive insurrection by Lucifer. The Manichaean demiurge against whom they fight is Ialdabaoth (Obama). Heaven is the realm of the Democrats, who have had their unjustifiable way for far too long; earth is the territory of the Republican angelic guardians of freedom and independence from external rule.
The ringleaders are Arcade and Istar (respectively Steve Bannon and Vladimir Putin) who plan to destroy the existing order - one merely the republican earthly order, but the other the heavenly democratic order as well, that is, the entire governmental system. These two arrange for the election of the angel Nectaire (Trump himself) as President and Contradictor despite his lack of previous military, governmental or even political experience.
Many other supporting characters are identifiable: the female angel Zita (the inimitable Sarah Palin who has already been abed with some of the other guardian angels), the financing angel Sophar (Robert Mercer, Breitbart investor and Trump supporter), the Archangel Michael (Robert Mueller, defender of heavenly interests), the unnamed earth-bound angel still loyal to God (Jeff Flake, of course attacked mercilessly by the rest), Monsieur Sariette (Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, who knows where all the bodies are buried; but this could also be Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, who fits the description of a wizened gnome more exactly), not forgetting the religious support of the Abbé Patouille (a French facsimile of Jerry Falwell).
The plan is simple:Our project," Istar said, "is a vast one. It embraces both Heaven and Earth. It is settled in every detail. We shall first bring about a social revolution ... "' '" this is facilitated by the lack of discernment among the mass of the human population, ""...in a country where the climate is soft and existence made easy? Even here, where necessity calls for intellectual activity, nothing is rarer than a person who thinks."
Consequently the situation is ripe,
One might surmise that the execution of such a project demands some level of familiarity with military tactics. But one would be wrong because
Unlike the first time round, the rebellious angels do succeed in the divine overthrow. Satan becomes God. But (who could have thought anything else) nothing substantive changes in either heaven or earth. Those in charge have those not in charge to worry about, thus the perpetual cycle of cosmic as well as national politics.
Now, of course, all this could be merely a product of my inflamed imagination. Trump may well have succeeded in mortally infecting my own discernment through his continual, pervasive rhetoric. But there is also the possibility that the entirety of the political events in America is following a perennial script, one not necessarily invented but certainly articulated by Anatole France. Just sayin'.
Can there be such a genre, biblical material excepted, as the anticipatory allegory? If so, Revolt of the Angels could well be a prime example.
In this week's NYRB (Nov. 6 2017), Charles Simic has a piece commemorating Trump's election. In it he puts Trump in a literary context:
"The only character I can think of in the world literature who resembles Donald Trump is Père Ubu in the play Ubu Roi (“Ubu the King”) by Alfred Jarry that famously opened and closed in Paris on December 10, 1896, after starting a riot. A parody of Shakespeare’s Macbeth... Ubu is a buffoonish pretender to the throne of Poland, a brutal and greedy megalomaniac who, after killing off the royal family, starts murdering his own population in order to rob them of their money."
I think Simic is exactly right to place Trump historically in the French Third Republic, and not just because of his Ubu-esque personality. In fin de siecle France Politics are polarised. Religious belief is a defining issue. Racism is on the rise. Freedom, defined to suit, is the rallying cry of both Right and Left. Terrorism is on everyone’s mind. Fake news is the only kind there is. The foundations of the democratic state seem less than they have been in decades. The Revolution has been betrayed and the Nation belittled.
Revolt of the Angels is a parody of this tumultuous period. But, frightenly I find, it is also a very precise allegory of today's USA - written a century before events. The characters and plot seem out of the Trumpian playbook
The Angels in question, mostly guardian and therefore the alter-egos of the individuals they protect, have decided to mount a Miltonian rerun of the abortive insurrection by Lucifer. The Manichaean demiurge against whom they fight is Ialdabaoth (Obama). Heaven is the realm of the Democrats, who have had their unjustifiable way for far too long; earth is the territory of the Republican angelic guardians of freedom and independence from external rule.
The ringleaders are Arcade and Istar (respectively Steve Bannon and Vladimir Putin) who plan to destroy the existing order - one merely the republican earthly order, but the other the heavenly democratic order as well, that is, the entire governmental system. These two arrange for the election of the angel Nectaire (Trump himself) as President and Contradictor despite his lack of previous military, governmental or even political experience.
Many other supporting characters are identifiable: the female angel Zita (the inimitable Sarah Palin who has already been abed with some of the other guardian angels), the financing angel Sophar (Robert Mercer, Breitbart investor and Trump supporter), the Archangel Michael (Robert Mueller, defender of heavenly interests), the unnamed earth-bound angel still loyal to God (Jeff Flake, of course attacked mercilessly by the rest), Monsieur Sariette (Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, who knows where all the bodies are buried; but this could also be Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, who fits the description of a wizened gnome more exactly), not forgetting the religious support of the Abbé Patouille (a French facsimile of Jerry Falwell).
The plan is simple:Our project," Istar said, "is a vast one. It embraces both Heaven and Earth. It is settled in every detail. We shall first bring about a social revolution ... "' '" this is facilitated by the lack of discernment among the mass of the human population, ""...in a country where the climate is soft and existence made easy? Even here, where necessity calls for intellectual activity, nothing is rarer than a person who thinks."
Consequently the situation is ripe,
"Beneath an apparently unchangeable exterior all is rotten within. A mere push would suffice to overturn an edifice which has not been touched for millions of centuries. Out-worn administration, out-worn army, out-worn finance, the whole thing is more worm-eaten than either the Russian or Persian autocracy."
One might surmise that the execution of such a project demands some level of familiarity with military tactics. But one would be wrong because
"The multiplication of technical means, by infinitely multiplying the opportunities for mistake, paralyses the genius of those in command. At a certain stage in the progress of military science, a stage which our models ...are about to reach, the cleverest leader and the most ignorant become equalized by reason of their incapacity....Great numbers, in war as elsewhere, annihilate intelligence and individual superiority in favour of a sort of exceedingly rudimentary collective soul."In short, Trump and Kim Jung Un seem well-matched. After all, as everyone knows deep down, "a war is a matter of business."
Unlike the first time round, the rebellious angels do succeed in the divine overthrow. Satan becomes God. But (who could have thought anything else) nothing substantive changes in either heaven or earth. Those in charge have those not in charge to worry about, thus the perpetual cycle of cosmic as well as national politics.
Now, of course, all this could be merely a product of my inflamed imagination. Trump may well have succeeded in mortally infecting my own discernment through his continual, pervasive rhetoric. But there is also the possibility that the entirety of the political events in America is following a perennial script, one not necessarily invented but certainly articulated by Anatole France. Just sayin'.
epictetsocrate's review against another edition
3.0
În umbra bisericii Saint-Sulpice, reşedinţa d’Esparvieu îşi înalţă cele trei etaje austere între o curte înverzită de muşchi şi o grădină micşorată din timp în timp de construcțiile tot mai înalte, tot mai apropiate, şi în care doi castani îşi mai înalţă creştetele ofilite. Aici a trăit, între 1825 şi 1857, marele bărbat al familiei, Alexandre Bussart d’Esparvieu, vice-preşedinte al Consiliului de Stat sub guvernul din Iulie, membru al Academiei de Ştiinţe morale şi politice, autor al Eseului asupra instituţiilor civile şi religioase ale popoarelor, în trei volume in-octavo, lucrare din păcate neterminată.
Acest eminent teoretician al monarhiei liberale lăsă drept moştenitor al sângelui, averii şi gloriei sale pe Fulgence-Adolphe Bussart d’Esparvieu, care fu senator sub al doilea Imperiu, îşi mări substanţial patrimoniul cumpărând terenuri pe care avea să treacă Bulevardul împărătesei şi pronunţă un discurs remarcabil în favoarea puterii vremelnice a papilor.
Fulgence avu trei fii. Cel mare, Marc-Alexandre, intrat în armată, făcu acolo o splendidă carieră: se pricepea să vorbească. Al doilea, Gaétan, cum nu dovedise nicio aptitudine deosebită, trăia mai mult la ţară, vâna, creştea cai, făcea muzică şi pictură. Al treilea, René, menit din copilărie magistraturii, îşi dădu demisia din funcţia de substitut pentru a nu contribui la aplicarea decretelor Ferry asupra congregaţiilor; şi mai târziu, văzând că sub preşedinţia domnului Fallieres revin zilele lui Decius şi Diocleţian, îşi puse ştiinţa şi zelul în slujba Bisericii persecutate.
Din vremea Concordatului de la 1801 şi până în ultimii ani ai celui de-al doilea Imperiu, toţi membrii familiei d’Esparvieu merseră regulat la liturghie, pentru a da exemplu. În sinea lor sceptici, considerau religia drept un mjiloc de guvernare. Domnii Marc şi René, primii din stirpea lor, vădiră semnele unei devoţiuni sincere. Generalul, pe când mai era colonel, îşi pusese regimentul sub patronajul Sfintei Inimi şi practica religia cu o fervoare care sărea în ochi chiar şi pentru un militar, deşi se ştie că pietatea, fiică a Cerului, a ales ca loc preferat pe pământ inima generalilor celei de a treia Republici. Credinţa îşi are însă vicisitudinile ei. Sub vechiul regim, poporul era credincios; nobilimea deloc, nici burghezia învăţată. Sub primul Imperiu, armata se dovedise, de sus până jos, ireverenţioasă la culme. Astăzi, poporul nu crede în nimic. Burghezia vrea să creadă, şi reuşeşte uneori, aşa cum reuşiră domnii Marc şi René d’Esparvieu. În schimb, domnul Gaétan, fratele lor, gentilom de ţară, nu izbuti defel; era agnostic, după cum se spune în societate pentru a nu folosi odiosul termen de liber cugetător. Şi se şi declara agnostic, în ciuda bunei-cuviinţe care pretinde ca aşa ceva să se treacă sub tăcere. Există în secolul în care ne aflăm atâtea feluri de a crede şi de a nu crede, încât istoricii viitorului greu se vor putea descurca. Noi înşine însă ne descurcăm mai bine în ce priveşte situaţia religiilor pe timpul lui Symmaque şi Ambrozie?
Acest eminent teoretician al monarhiei liberale lăsă drept moştenitor al sângelui, averii şi gloriei sale pe Fulgence-Adolphe Bussart d’Esparvieu, care fu senator sub al doilea Imperiu, îşi mări substanţial patrimoniul cumpărând terenuri pe care avea să treacă Bulevardul împărătesei şi pronunţă un discurs remarcabil în favoarea puterii vremelnice a papilor.
Fulgence avu trei fii. Cel mare, Marc-Alexandre, intrat în armată, făcu acolo o splendidă carieră: se pricepea să vorbească. Al doilea, Gaétan, cum nu dovedise nicio aptitudine deosebită, trăia mai mult la ţară, vâna, creştea cai, făcea muzică şi pictură. Al treilea, René, menit din copilărie magistraturii, îşi dădu demisia din funcţia de substitut pentru a nu contribui la aplicarea decretelor Ferry asupra congregaţiilor; şi mai târziu, văzând că sub preşedinţia domnului Fallieres revin zilele lui Decius şi Diocleţian, îşi puse ştiinţa şi zelul în slujba Bisericii persecutate.
Din vremea Concordatului de la 1801 şi până în ultimii ani ai celui de-al doilea Imperiu, toţi membrii familiei d’Esparvieu merseră regulat la liturghie, pentru a da exemplu. În sinea lor sceptici, considerau religia drept un mjiloc de guvernare. Domnii Marc şi René, primii din stirpea lor, vădiră semnele unei devoţiuni sincere. Generalul, pe când mai era colonel, îşi pusese regimentul sub patronajul Sfintei Inimi şi practica religia cu o fervoare care sărea în ochi chiar şi pentru un militar, deşi se ştie că pietatea, fiică a Cerului, a ales ca loc preferat pe pământ inima generalilor celei de a treia Republici. Credinţa îşi are însă vicisitudinile ei. Sub vechiul regim, poporul era credincios; nobilimea deloc, nici burghezia învăţată. Sub primul Imperiu, armata se dovedise, de sus până jos, ireverenţioasă la culme. Astăzi, poporul nu crede în nimic. Burghezia vrea să creadă, şi reuşeşte uneori, aşa cum reuşiră domnii Marc şi René d’Esparvieu. În schimb, domnul Gaétan, fratele lor, gentilom de ţară, nu izbuti defel; era agnostic, după cum se spune în societate pentru a nu folosi odiosul termen de liber cugetător. Şi se şi declara agnostic, în ciuda bunei-cuviinţe care pretinde ca aşa ceva să se treacă sub tăcere. Există în secolul în care ne aflăm atâtea feluri de a crede şi de a nu crede, încât istoricii viitorului greu se vor putea descurca. Noi înşine însă ne descurcăm mai bine în ce priveşte situaţia religiilor pe timpul lui Symmaque şi Ambrozie?
agathakr's review against another edition
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
4.0
chaosthelibrarian's review against another edition
3.0
didn't love it but the ending is worth the read