Reviews

Ninefox Gambit by Yoon Ha Lee

tomasthanes's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Wow. Spectacular world building but getting oriented in that world is a challenge. Even now, having finished the book, I'm not sure that I've gotten everything down. Even re-reading the book may not help. Religion and calendrical rot, factions and heretics, hexarchs and heptarchs, moths and servitors, ... So much.

It's worth reading but expect to work at it.

stephxsu's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

jujicakes's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character

4.0

krystaldelusion's review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

youshouldreadthisif's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

llayaz's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

micksland's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

3 stars

Winner: 2017 Locus Award for Best First Novel
Nominee: 2017 Arthur C. Clarke Award
Nominee: 2017 Hugo Award for Best Novel
Nominee: 2017 Nebula Award for Best Novel

___

This book received critical acclaim, and it's easy to see why. The concept behind the novel is that the universe is governed by the imperial calendar, which is effectively a mass delusion. As the number of followers increases, the government gains more and more power, allowing it to change the fundamental rules of physics. Heretics that weaken the calendar are to be exterminated.

Enter the protagonist, Kel Cheris, who is sent to put down a heresy along with the consciousness of a dead mass murder trapped inside her skull. (Wait, what?)

Lee does excellent things with the plot, and I was very invested in seeing how the story turned out. However, there was something jarring and off-putting about the worldbuilding that I never quite got over. The novel is relatively short, and I kept wanting more explanations for everything.

As an example, the Kel fleet is divided into ships called cindermoths, boxmoths, and bannermoths, among others. But why are they moths? Are they living symbiotes? Are they just metal ships shaped like moths? And what is the difference between them? Similarly, the lack of information made it difficult to keep track of the various factions, both within and outside the government. There was no dearth of interesting ideas, but I would have appreciated more time to explore all of them.

Even with those critiques, I absolutely loved the two protagonists and I'm interested in seeing what happens as the story progresses. Now that I have a (precarious) grasp on the worldbuilding, I think I'll enjoy the sequel more.

rachaar's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

lucardus's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Ich gestehe, ich bin nicht ganz sicher, was ich von diesem Roman halten soll. Einerseits tut sich hier ein (zumindest dem Eindruck nach) einzigartiges Universum mit exotischen Waffen und Technologien auf, andererseits bleibt all dies aber auch irgendwie auf Abstand von mir als Leser.

Während sich die erste Hälfte etwas zieht, wird es im zweiten Teil interessanter, vor allem, weil andere (wenn auch meist kurzzeitige) Perspektiven eingestreut werden und nicht nur die der Hauptprotagonistin. Trotzdem man Einblicke in die Welt des Hexarchats erhält, bleibt Vieles unklar bis zum Ende: Welche Technologie/Physik steckt hinter den (ziemlich verheerenden) Waffensystemen; Was hat es mit den "exotischen Effekten" auf sich, was mit den Gefechtsformationen der Kel; Inwieweit spielen die kalendarischen Systeme und Mathematik eine Rolle?

Hinzu kommt, dass ich zur Hauptprotagonistin keine emotionale Bindung aufbauen konnte und sich obendrein ein "Sense of Wonder" nur sehr eingeschränkt einstellt, denn es bleibt oft bei Beschreibungen von Waffenwirkungen und Gefechtssituationen, während andere Dinge für meinen Geschmack zu wenig dargestellt und "belebt" werden. Insgesamt litt meine Leselust im ersten Teil vor allem darunter, dass die "Belagerung" der häretischen "Fortress of Scattered Needles" irgendwie nicht von der Stelle kommt. Diese Mischung aus rätselhafter Technologie und Military-SF hat mich in gewisser Weise kalt gelassen, obwohl sie eigentlich vom Ansatz schon hochinteressant sein müsste. Die Autorin hat sich keinen Gefallen darin getan, mich als Leser hier fast völlig allein zu lassen, obwohl ich nicht gerade wenig Erfahrung mit SF habe und durchaus in der Lage bin auch exotischere Szenarien zu verdauen.

Erst in der zweiten Hälfte hingegen nimmt der Roman an Fahrt auf und lässt zumindest ansatzweise erkennen, welches Potential in diesem Universum und der Geschichte insgesamt liegen könnte.

Momentan habe ich den Eindruck, dass man die Trilogie insgesamt bewerten muss, um hier ein faires Urteil fällen zu können, aber es reicht nicht zu einer 4-Sterne-Wertung für den ersten Band.

wayfarer06's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark medium-paced

4.0