1.32k reviews for:

Vanki

Jussi Adler-Olsen

3.83 AVERAGE

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
dark mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Enjoyed this. Quick read with interesting storyline. Will continue with series. 
dark mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging dark emotional sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

For me, the investigation was the best part (as usually is it, sincerely) of the book. The case was sometimes too dark, what I can accept as an important way to make you care for the victim. However, it took me forever to advance with the book because the misogyny almost made me DNF it. It became clear that the misogyny was from the author, that found important to have women in the book only to be objectified or vilified. I read books written in the 1920s that had less misogyny than this book

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No

I didn’t  DNF this book because I was trying to determine if it was the main character who is a misogynist, or the author. It’s both. If the main character has any redeeming qualities, they were lost on me. 

Though the perpetrator was obvious from start, the interesting plot wasn’t enough to overcome the unlikable characters and sexism. 
dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Spennende krim med et etterforskningsteam det er morsomt å bli kjent med. Særlig Assad.

En svag 3,5.
Man kan typen nu: trött, desillusionerad polis, brott av knäppgök med väl skruvat motiv. Lite gubbigt. Polisens sidekick är den som mest väcker läsarens nyfikenhet. Vilka befogenheter har han egentligen, hur har han fått sina speciella kunskaper? Kanske får jag svar i nästa del, för boken var tillräckligt bra för att man ska vilja fortsätta.