Reviews

House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

kellykemp's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

So good. So damn good. 

waaandering's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

HOLY FUCKING SHIT

sierrabecker's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This book was an experience that I’m unsure if I was fully prepared for..

Mark Z. Danielewski makes you work your ass off to read this book and then leaves you feeling vulnerable and perplexed after the fact.

Even though it can be a little pretentious at times, the story and formatting had me in a complete chokehold. When I wasn’t reading it, I was thinking about it. When I was reading it, I had tunnel vision.

I may not fully understand what is truly going on here, but I can almost guarantee that I will never stop trying to decipher the puzzle that is House of Leaves, and I think THAT is the beauty in it all.

I would like to note that I am not the biggest reading enthusiast. I enjoy reading warm, cozy stories and a classic “who done it” in my down time. Just little reads to take the edge off. To say that I was intimidated by this one is an understatement but I am so glad that I pushed through. This book is for anyone, despite what anyone (or any page;) tells you. How you read it and interpret it is subjective. Just do it and hate me, I mean thank me later.

banksyhater's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

To me this is a normal house… heh… just a peek into my dark and twisted mind

billiamdyemyhair's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A masterpiece for sure and a book you can truly analyze forever and still find new things, completely captivating in almost every way, a meta narrative within a meta narrative within probably another 7 meta narratives, but at the same time has a lot of sections that I just don’t think are very good. Some of the rambling by ALL of the authors was unnecessary and in my opinion pointless. If they were intended to be that way I am glad the author had that idea but it doesn’t resolve how bored I was through some of it.

That still doesn’t take away from how amazing it really is, I just don’t know if I can put it in my top 10 favorite. It is probably the fastest I have ever read a book of this size but maybe that’s because, unlike the house, the book is smaller on the inside than the outside.

thapacki's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

A book with a simple yet terrifying theme. What if a house was bigger on the inside than the outside ? A unsettling and creepy reading experience like no other. The author does an incredible job of getting you to feel all the anxiety and tension that builds up in the house. Definitely not for everyone but if you are into unique books with a touch of the unimaginable, check it out.

northwestbooksies's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

4.25

niaamore's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

 | Favorite Quote | It may be the wrong decision, but fuck it, it's mine.

| My Review | This review is going to be a personal one. So, before I go on and on, here is the overall review.

This book is one of a kind. I don’t know if I can recommend reading it. It’s weird, disturbing, and very very sad. Everyone seems to have a different experience with it. If you’re curious, I urge you to give it a try.

Now for the personal bit. This book was a favorite of an old friend of mine, a ten year long friendship, with a person I’ve lost contact with. It’s funny how life can turn your closest friends into strangers. Oftentimes it’s the little things that make you drift apart, like a busy work schedule. You may never see them again, but every so often, you’ll come across something that reminds you of them, and you feel all the old memories resurface. Finding this book at the back of my closet did just that.

I promised him I’d read this book, and I can now say that I have. The cruel twist of fate is that the experiences I’ve had since our friendship has made me appreciate this book even more than I would have if I read it before splitting ways. It’s safe to say, the experience I had reading House of Leaves was a whirlwind of emotions.

The synopsis of House of Leaves is deceiving. It’s pitched as a story about a man named Johnny who discovers a dead man’s manuscript about a film called The Navidson Record. The film is about a creepy house and the family that lives in it. The catch? The film never existed, and the man writing the manuscript, Zampano, is blind.

Creepy, right? This is the type of book that crawls under your skin. I couldn’t sleep the first night I started reading it. Then, by accident, I got spoiled by a fan theory I found in a comment section of a youtube video about unique books with strange formatting. I don’t want to spoil the book, so the next section will be marked as such. It’s about the story behind the story. I recommend reading the book first, if you haven’t, as the theory may ruin the horror.

House of Leaves is a book about a man named Johnny Truant who was severely traumatized by his abusive father, and is grieving the death of his schizophrenic mother. We learn early on that Johnny has a talent for storytelling. His friend Lude would often throw out a prompt, and Johnny would then create a story around it on the spot. The editors, who have been tasked to make sense of the manuscript Johnny had given them, add both Johnny's father’s eulogy, and his mother’s letters while in a care facility. Through this, we learn of his trauma, and of his mother’s illness. We also learn that his mother is an exceptional writer. A talent Johnny seems to have inherited.

All of these hints allude to the fact that Zampano, along with The Navidson Record, are entirely made up by Johnny himself. The theory is that this book was written just after his mother’s death. The symptoms he experiences are likely early signs of schizophrenia. The story of The Navidson Record is symbolic of his trauma. The endless dark hallways represent the trauma within, the outside of the house being the mask he wears, and the fate of the characters who venture into the house represent the struggle of dealing with said trauma. The monster in the house is sometimes referenced as a minotaur in a labyrinth, a Greek mythological story about a man with a bull’s head who is forced to roam in a maze until he is slain. The myth and the book both allude to the mix of sympathy and horror we feel towards the beast.

Knowing now that House of Leaves is actually a story about trauma, and the quest one must go on to heal from it, gave me closure I didn’t know I needed. My friend always had a taste for the dark and depressing. His other favorite collection of novels is Pun Pun, a manga series arguably more dark and depressing than this book. I even once saw him read A Little Life by Hanya Yanagihara with a straight face. It’s safe to say, he faces the darkness head on. I’m more of a love sick optimist, one who lives for stories with found family and happy endings. I may avoid books with heavy themes such as this in the future, but I’m glad I got to read this one.

I doubt he’ll read this review, but I still wish him well. I also wish you well, dear reader. Even if you stumble and fall, and make some bad decisions along the way, just know they are yours, in the end. And if you can learn from them, that is something to be proud of. 
 

charwizard's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad slow-paced

4.0

zombie_loves_books's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Experience 9/10
Story(ies) 4-7/10 depending on story.
So personally I didn't find this as complex as I was lead to believe it would be. I was amped and ready for a difficult, harrowing read and did not get that. I did annotate though most of them where me ranting about how shitty everyone was,
except Tom. I loved Tom and nearly cried for him. RIP Tom you didnt deserve what happened to you.

The parts I really enjoyed where more towards the end and I wish where explored more.